In previous article we talked about using expected return
formula to make trading decision (Read
more here). It is easy to calculate
the expected return but, getting the right number for each variable in the
formula is not so straight forward.
MACD was created by Gerald Appel in the late 1970s (Read more here). It is a good technical indicator to determine
the chances of trend reversal, or in another word, the chances of generating positive
return in either long or short position.
Today, we will just focus on the long position.
The technical chart below (Chart 1) is the AirAsia chart
from April 2015 till June 2016. During
the period from June 2015 to end of August 2015, the stock price was hammered
down rapidly. Then at the beginning of
September 2015, the stock price trend was reversed. The MACD indicator clearly showed that chance
of the trend reversal was getting higher.
What are the criteria for us to confirm the MACD divergence? The following method was fine-tuned by a
popular China trader Xu Xiao Ming (Read more here).
Chart 1
MACD divergence confirmation criteria (long position)
1.
Closing price at new low but both MACD
line (blue) and signal line (red) do not make new low.
2.
There are three distinctive MACD bar valleys
and hill formation, as indicated in the chart as number 1, 2 and 3.
3.
The MACD bar in valley 3 must be shorter
than the MACD bar in valley 1.
4.
During the period transitioning from valley
1 to valley 3, both MACD and signal lines did not cross zero line.
5.
The entry point is near the valley 3 where
the MACD line cut above the signal line.
I have done many data collection on the accuracy of the MACD
divergence using historical data and histogram analysis (Read more
here), it is quite good to be used as the estimation for p in the expected return
formula for Index but not for individual stock.
Table 1 below is the summary.
Table 1
Chart type
|
Chances of trend reversal, p (Index)
|
Chances of trend reversal, p (Stock)
|
15 minutes chart
|
50%
|
Not reliable
|
30 minutes chart
|
60%
|
Not reliable
|
60 minutes chart
|
70%
|
Not reliable
|
Daily chart
|
80%
|
50%
|
Daily + minutes chart coincide
|
90%
|
50%
|
My data only cover Hang Seng Index, Shanghai Index, FTSE
China Series Index (see Chart 2), and Bursa Malaysia individual stock. I do not have sufficient data for Bursa KLCI
or EMAS index as for the past three years, no MACD divergence was formed. Readers who are interested to help collect
data on other indices or individual stock can contact me via email or leave your comment. We can form a database for better trading! J
Chart 2
To keep the article short, and easy to digest, I will discuss how to use technical chart to estimate RW and RL, to complete the whole expected return formula in another article.
Disclaimer: The above technical analysis do not imply any buy or sell recommendation. The author disclaims all liabilities arising
from any use of the information contained in this article.
No comments:
Post a Comment