One distinctive characteristic of banks is their asset
composition. Generally, non-financial
companies’ assets are predominantly tangible assets, such as plants, properties
and equipment. While bank assets are
predominantly financial assets such as loans and securities and their
liabilities are primarily deposits.
Banks are also heavily regulated by authorities as such,
capital, minimum liquidity, and the riskiness of assets must meet authorities’
requirements.
Hence, certain conventional financial ratios such as Gross
Profit Margin, Inventory Turnover, Current Ratio and D/E etc are not relevant.
The most common rating approach for banks is “CAMELS”, an acronym of six components
as follows:
Capital
adequacy
Capital adequacy for banks is described in terms of the
proportion of the bank’s assets funded with capital. For purposes of
determining capital adequacy, a bank’s assets are adjusted based on their risk,
with riskier assets requiring a higher weightage.
Asset
quality
Asset quality pertains to the amount of existing and
potential credit risk associated with a bank’s assets and focuses primarily on
financial assets.
Management
capabilities
Management capability is the ability to identify and control
risk, including credit risk, market risk, operating risk, legal risk, and other
risks.
Earnings
sufficiency
Earning sufficiency means banks should ideally generate an
amount of earnings to provide an adequate return on capital to their capital
providers and specifically to reward their stockholders through capital
appreciation and/or distribution of earnings.
Liquidity
position
Adequate liquidity is essential for any type of entity.
Banks’ systemic importance increases the importance of adequate liquidity. If a
non-bank entity’s insufficient liquidity prevents it from paying a current
liability, the impact would primarily affect the entity’s own supply chain.
Sensitivity
to market risk
Banks’ operational sensitivity to interest rates, exchange
rates, equity prices, or commodity prices are key to its financial strength.
Table 1 shows some selected ratios that fall within CAMELS rating methodology, amongst
other:
Category
|
Financial Ratio
|
Capital Adequacy
|
Common Equity Tier (CET)
1 Capital Ratio;
Total Capital Ratio
|
Asset Quality
|
Gross Impaired Loan
Ratio (GIL)
|
Management Capabilities
|
Cost to Income Ratio;
Efficiency Ratio
|
Earnings Sufficiency
|
Return On Equity
(ROE)
|
Liquidity Positions
|
Liquidity Coverage
Ratio (LCR);
Net Stable Funding Ratio
(NSFR)
|
Sensitivity to Market Risk
|
Value at Risk (VaR)
|
Non-CAMELS
|
|
Liquidity
|
Loan to Deposit Ratio
(LDR)
|
Valuation
|
Price to Book (PB)
|
Table 1. Selected
Financial Ratios for CAMELS and non-CAMELS rating methodology
The ratios for CAME are
readily available in Annual Reports, but the "Liquidity Positions" and "Sensitivity
to Market Risk" are not commonly reported in banks’ Annual Reports. For instance, BASEL III (Read
more here) requires banks to report LCR and NSFR on monthly basis
but they are not disclosed in the Annual Report. Also, VaR is not published in an annual
report as well. Thus, for retail
investors to evaluate the ratios of bank stocks, both “Liquidity Positions” and “Sensitivity
to Market Risk” categories are replaced with liquidity and valuation ratio such
as LDR and PB.
Table 2 and 3 are some real-world examples of the above
ratios based on eight commercial banks listed on Bursa Malaysia. Readers are reminded not to rely solely on
the brief financial ratio ranking for investment decision.
Table 2. Selected Financial Ratios for eight commercial
banks listed on Bursa Malaysia
Source:
Dynaquest Sdn. Bhd. STOCKBASE platform, except *. See “Notes” at the end of this article for
Copyrights details.
* Calculated based on latest Annual Report
Table 3. Ranking
based on Financial Ratios in Table 2
Reference:
Analysis of Financial
Institutions by Jack T. Ciesielski, CPA, CFA, and Elaine Henry, PhD, CFA
Disclaimer: The above analysis
does not imply any buy or sell recommendation.
The author disclaims all liabilities arising from any use of the
information contained in this article.
Disclosure: The author may have interest in the stocks of the companies
in this article.
Notes: The data are the property
of Dynaquest Sdn. Bhd. It is subject to Intellectual Property Rights
and T&C. Do not reproduce without
the consent from Dynaquest Sdn. Bhd.
(The author has signed a “Data Sharing Agreement” with Dynaquest Sdn.
Bhd., based on a “Data Sharing Fee”, to use the data from Dynaquest Sdn. Bhd.’s
STOCKBASE platform in this blog. The
content of this blog in no way represents the views or opinions of Dynaquest
Sdn. Bhd.)
Hey...Great information thanks for sharing such a valuable information
ReplyDeletetotal capital adequacy ratio
Hey...Great information thanks for sharing such a valuable information. you may also check our blog.
ReplyDeleteC&C Constructions