In previous article we talked about using expected return
formula to make investment decision (Read
more here). This simple yet robust
approach can easily distinguish the risk adjusted return of an investment
vehicle over the long run. However,
there are cases where the investors prefer lower expected return due to
psychological influence.
Example,
Jack came across a promotional material about a fast-growing
fund named SCK Fund. When comparing with
conventional utilities sector focused ENW fund, SCK fund could generate 30%
annual return while ENW fund could generate 6% annual return. After talking to several investors on these
funds, Jack found that the return on SCK fund was relatively volatile with 50%
chances that it could generate either 30% or -25% returns. Meanwhile, ENW fund performance was fairly
stable, the ratio of generating 6% and -1% returns were 80:20. Many SCK fund investors told Jack to pick SCK
fund even though it had higher risk, because they believed that higher return
always come with higher risk. If you
were Jack, which fund would you prefer?
Let’s do the math.
ENW fund
E(R) = (p)(RW)
+ (1-p)(RL)
= (0.8)(6%)
+ (0.2)(-1%)
= 4.6%
SCK fund
E(R) = (p)(RW)
+ (1-p)(RL)
=
(0.5)(30%) + (0.5)(-25%)
= 2.5%
Based on the expected return calculation, ENW fund was a better
choice but many investors might opt for SCK fund due to the attractive higher
return and also, sometimes, the marketing influence.
Rather than using Expected return to compare the funds' performance, using Sharpe ratio would it be more appropriate as to valuate the funds' performance with the factor of returns and volatility?
ReplyDeleteHi han,
DeleteThanks for your comment. The volatility input in Sharpe ratio include positive return as well. Most of the time investors care more about losses rather than volatility.